dprvoting.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the dprvoting.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host dprvoting.org. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Fast Hosts Ltd .

the related websites

parliament.uk soundstop.co.uk totallyexec.com gothiagroup.com electoralcommission.org.uk very.co.uk forbes.com gkdevelopers.com appscend.com dentistrytoday.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Microsoft-IIS/7.5 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

(dpr) first published in 2010 | about this site cookies policy useful links useful addresses contact (dpr voting) home see the video dpr in practice fptp and electoral reform gender balance variant (unbiased and self correcting) systems comparison (+ comparison with stv) more about voting reform blog dpr voting - simple practical electoral reform help mend our democracy why dpr voting? in parliamentary party politics, your party would have a fair vote - it's proportional. but in your constituency you could just choose the best person to be your mp. that means a parliament with overall better mps, not just party puppets. why not fptp? the claim that 'first past the post' (fptp) provides strong and stable government is no longer tenable. ... fptp election results are erratic, unpredictable, you could say undemocratic. our country is fiercely divided, and we don't have the political culture of trying to find cross party agreement. more than ever we need a pr voting system. changing the voting system is central to uk electoral and political reform. we need a new voting system we need a better balance between the government, political parties, the elected members, and the people. we can have a better voting system than first past the post. in a referendum, your vote counts. it should count in a general election. too often, it doesn't. to make your vote count in a general election, we need a proportional voting system (pr) with dpr voting we could have a pr system with single member constituencies dpr voting shows you how dpr voting is a pr voting system that retains some features of fptp and addresses the drawbacks of ams/mmp and stv as a result, most of the arguments against electoral reform are neutralised .. with dpr voting you have two ballot papers, two votes one vote - for the candidate - the person you want to be your local mp , on your first ballot paper. you elect your mp to represent your constituency, regardless of party affiliation. if the mp has a party affiliation, he/she will become a member of that party's parliamentary party. one vote - for the parliamentary party you support on the other ballot paper. the parliamentary party is the group of the party's members elected to parliament. this is not a vote for a candidate or a party list of candidates. this second vote determines how many votes each parliamentary party will have in parliament. that is, it determines how many votes, collectively, each party group of elected mps will have in parliament. .. the result? one mp in each constituency - for local, personal, accountable politics. simple and quick voting and counting that everyone can understand - for transparency and clarity. party proportional voting - for a fairer balance in politics. every vote in every constituency counts - for everybody to re-engage with politics .. a short explanation of dpr voting - web page or two page pdf from arend lijphart , professor emeritus of political science, university of california, san diego. ( nov 2011) thank you for bringing the dpr voting system to my attention. i had not heard of it before. i agree with you that it represents a big improvement compared with the current fptp system in the uk, because it is basically a pr instead of a majoritarian system. my own preference is for straightforward list pr, but the practical advantage of dpr voting may be that it may be more acceptable to the british public. good luck with your proposal! arend. the total votes cast for each party across the whole country could determine how many votes each party should have in the parliament. the numbers should be proportional. let’s call these numbers the ‘fair votes’. first past the post cannot result in ‘fair votes’ except by an unlikely accident. in order to reflect the way the votes were cast, many ‘proportional voting’ (pr) systems try to match the number of mps to the number of fair votes for each party. compromises have to be made. some compromises are less satisfactory than others. turkeys? the self interest of existing conservative and labour mps is a barrier to electoral reform . 'turkeys do not vote for christmas. ' unlike other pr systems, dpr voting is no barrier to the mps who deserve to be elected on their merits. dpr voting is an alternative to 'first past the post' (fptp) for uk general elections ... advantages: compared with fptp and other pr systems .. • proportional representation (pr) - but with minimal change to the voting system. • one mp in each constituency - for local political campaigning and accountability • constituencies unchanged - for continuity, and local involvement • little change to voting admin - the change would be low cost, and easy • simple, quick voting and counting - for democratic inclusiveness and transparency • no ‘marginal’ constituencies - every vote in every constituency matters • no ‘safe’ seats - mps are not elected on their party's popularity • every vote makes a difference - it gives you every reason to vote • fair to both large and small parties - the system does not favour any party • boundary revisions - frequent boundary revision is not necessary • small parties - no proliferation of unviably small parties • independent candidates - have a fair chance. this simple change would make our electoral system so much better, fairer, democratic. help make the change! the democratic concept in the polling booth two ballot papers, one vote to elect a member of parliament, and a separate ballot paper to vote for the party. the first ballot paper elects a single mp in each constituency (by simple majority). the second ballot paper vote totals are counted nationwide, like a referendum. it is the nationwide total of ‘party’ votes cast that alone determines how many votes each parliamentary party has in the parliament. in parliament each party shares its parliamentary votes out equally amongst its own mps (so each mp exercises one share of their party’s total vote in parliamentary divisions, and has a vote equal to every other of their party's mps.) the concept of sharing out the parliamentary party's vote: instead of a vote, think cake. if the vote was a cake, with fptp each mp is given an identical cupcake. in dpr voting each mp is given an equal slice of their party’s cake. each parliamentary party will have a different size cake to share out. the size depends on the number of party votes cast. mps can have their cake/vote and use it as they see fit (as with fptp). single member constituencies all mps are elected in single member constituencies - there are no 'party list' mps . dpr voting is especially suitable to replace fptp because much of the election process is unchanged. simple proportional representation the number of votes each parliamentary party has in the parliament is proportional to the party votes they win in the general election. it is a 'single member constituency, party proportional' electoral system voting is simple. counting is simple, quick, and transparent . practical electoral reform it requires little change to the familiar first past the post (fptp) system. no change is needed to the number of mps, or to constituency boundaries . introducing dpr voting would make voting reform in the uk relatively easy and cheap . choice you have two ballot papers – one to elect your mp, one for the party you support. you have the freedom to choose the best candidate to be your mp , regardless of party. you have the freedom to choose the best party to govern , regardless of the local candidate. your vote for the candidate you want to be your mp is not counted as a vote for any of the parties. your vote for the party of your choice is not counted as a vote for any of the candidates. power shifts away from the party, towards the mp, and to the electorate. this encourages independent minded mps and independent mps. . dpr voting is a pr system that retains some features of fptp and addresses the disadvantages of ams/mmp and stv. as a result, most of the arguments aga

URL analysis for dprvoting.org

http://www.dprvoting.org/standards/about.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/dpr_in_practice.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/blog.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/#top
http://www.dprvoting.org/gender_balance_voting.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/pdfs/description_word.doc
http://www.dprvoting.org/short_description.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/system_comparison.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/standards/useful_links.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/pdfs/short_description.pdf
http://www.dprvoting.org/pdfs/description.pdf
http://www.dprvoting.org/dpr_in_practice.htm#parliament
http://www.dprvoting.org/dpr_in_practice.htm#behaviour
http://www.dprvoting.org/standards/addresses.htm
http://www.dprvoting.org/standards/cookies_policy.htm

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: DPRVOTING.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D158470151-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2017-01-28T14:11:36Z
Creation Date: 2010-02-27T13:49:35Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-02-27T13:49:35Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Tucows Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: C182980052-LROR
Registrant Name: Philip S K Johnson
Registrant Organization: Philip S K Johnson
Registrant Street: Dunelm House
Registrant Street: Ivydene Crescent
Registrant City: Chidham
Registrant State/Province: West Sussex
Registrant Postal Code: PO18 8TR
Registrant Country: GB
Registrant Phone: +44.1243572059
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: C182980053-LROR
Admin Name: Philip S K Johnson
Admin Organization: Philip S K Johnson
Admin Street: Dunelm House
Admin Street: Ivydene Crescent
Admin City: Chidham
Admin State/Province: West Sussex
Admin Postal Code: PO18 8TR
Admin Country: GB
Admin Phone: +44.1243572059
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: C182980054-LROR
Tech Name: Philip S K Johnson
Tech Organization: Philip S K Johnson
Tech Street: Dunelm House
Tech Street: Ivydene Crescent
Tech City: Chidham
Tech State/Province: West Sussex
Tech Postal Code: PO18 8TR
Tech Country: GB
Tech Phone: +44.1243572059
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: NS1.LIVEDNS.CO.UK
Name Server: NS2.LIVEDNS.CO.UK
Name Server: NS3.LIVEDNS.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-07-16T09:40:46Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS dprvoting.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME dprvoting.org

  HANDLE D158470151-LROR

  CREATED 2010-02-27

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.192.250

  NS2.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.193.250

  NS3.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.192.254

OWNER

  HANDLE C182980052-LROR

  NAME Philip S K Johnson

  ORGANIZATION Philip S K Johnson

ADDRESS

STREET
Dunelm House
Ivydene Crescent

  CITY Chidham

  STATE West Sussex

  PCODE PO18 8TR

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.1243572059

  EMAIL [email protected]

ADMIN

  HANDLE C182980053-LROR

  NAME Philip S K Johnson

  ORGANIZATION Philip S K Johnson

ADDRESS

STREET
Dunelm House
Ivydene Crescent

  CITY Chidham

  STATE West Sussex

  PCODE PO18 8TR

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.1243572059

  EMAIL [email protected]

TECH

  HANDLE C182980054-LROR

  NAME Philip S K Johnson

  ORGANIZATION Philip S K Johnson

ADDRESS

STREET
Dunelm House
Ivydene Crescent

  CITY Chidham

  STATE West Sussex

  PCODE PO18 8TR

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.1243572059

  EMAIL [email protected]

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .